|
24 APR 2006 |
|
Flight
Tested: Zaon XRX Portable Collision Avoidance System |
|
We have
reviewed a number of Portable Collision Avoidance Systems (PCAS) from
Zaon (formerly marketed under the SureCheck brand. See
here
to read about the TrafficScope Micro and
here
to check on the VRX). We had the
opportunity to flight test their latest model in traffic detection
systems which not only includes information on relative altitude and
range but also in which direction to look for traffic, in other
words quadrant bearing. The
ZaonFlight XRX is a huge improvement over their previous top model and
well worth the investment in making your skies safer. Have a look
at why we think so. |
|
 |
|
Previous
models from Zaon/SureCheck were already masters in detecting conflicting
traffic within your bubble of airspace up to 6 miles away but you still
had to swivel your head 360° to see where the threat was coming from.
Nearby
traffic could well be behind you and closing in and in most aircraft
there is a huge blind spot underneath, above and behind you and no
matter how good someone's scan is there is unseen traffic all around
us. And I want to know about it...
The XRX has
a directional antenna array which is capable of detecting aircraft from
inside the cockpit and indicate from which 45° segment the threat is
coming from.
ZaonFlight,
as far as we know, is the only company in the world to have developed a
portable system that can do this. To get directional information
on nearby traffic on other systems you would have to invest about 10
times the amount you pay for the XRX.
Let's talk
a bit more about the technology as well as the capabilities and
limitations of this PCAS system.
The XRX is
a passive collision avoidance system. This means that it depends
on the interrogation of ground-based radar stations and/or TCAS active
systems along your flight path. With ground radar having a coverage of
typically 200 miles plus and aircraft based TCAS covering a bubble
around them of some 100 miles, there is not a lot of airspace where the
XRX doesn't pick up any traffic. That applies certainly to the USA but
also to more sparsely populated areas such as here in Australia.
The
zaonflight.com website has some excellent background material on how
exactly the transponder interrogation takes place and so do their
promotional material and the excellently written manual.
|
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
|
The XRX is
shipped in a hard carrying case which also contains several silicone
mounting feet to level the XRX out on your dashboard. You'll also find
here the power adapter to plug it into your ship’s system and an audio
cable so that you can hear any warnings immediately through your
headset. The female voice is certain to get your attention even if the
unit is not directly mounted in your line of sight. The XRX can be
mounted at a 45° angle on the co-pilot’s glare shield but needs to be
“re-calibrated” (a simple process) for that position. Ideally it is
directly in front of you but the dash in our pressurised 210 is just a
fraction too high to have the box mounted there and interferes with
seeing the piano keys on final approach. Needless to say the company is
also working on offering a panel mounted solution with a remote antenna
as they are doing for all their systems.
This is what Jason Clemens, CEO at Zaon, said to me:
“For MRX
[the new version of the TrafficScope Micro – Ed.], the install kit
will be available mid-April, and it will be very inexpensive. For XRX,
it's much more complex than MRX, involving a remote screen, and
remote-mounted custom-produced antennas. We are expecting to unveil the
beta version at Oshkosh (July), with production units available by
October. For pilots in the US, the first version will not be FAA
certified... The market will be homebuilts and experimentals. However,
we are working with the FAA to get an STC'd version out at close to the
same time.”
It is of
course extremely handy to have a portable system if you rent your
aircraft. Just make sure that that new Cessna has a power point... |
 |
.JPG) |
|
One of the
first things you'll hear when switching on the XRX is the little fan
that keeps the thing cool. Of course you know about the big fan upfront
that is supposed to keep you cool but this little fella is quite
essential to keep the electronic happy on that hot, hot dashboard. As I
mentioned in my previous review the VRX did not have inbuilt cooling and
on sunny days I would have to shield the box from overheating. It did
not help that the box was black either which absorbs even more heat.
The only advantage of the unit being black is that it doesn't glare in
your windshield but the new XRX, “resplendent” in dull grey, is equally
easy on the eyes.
The fan
noise is not something you'll hear in flight. If you do, you'll have a
problem…
The Zaon
XRX is easy to set up. It's basically a question of power hook-up,
connecting the audio cables if you want to and away you go. Unless you
have a pressurised aircraft in which case you need to open up a little
plastic hatch on the bottom which gives access to two sets of
configuration switches. This needs to be done because the XRX has an
internal altimeter. This gives the local altitude and establishes a
base reference to figure out the relative altitude of other aircraft.
When I fly in our pressurised 210 the unit bypasses the built-in
altimeter and relies on the transmission from my own transponder to get
the base reference.
Before you
start flying you need to indicate on the menu screen whether you are
flying a high or a low wing metal aircraft and also set the range and
altitude of your airspace bubble. The type of wing configuration in
metal airplanes determines the amount of antenna pattern compensation
the XRX applies. No compensation is needed with composite aircraft.
There is a bit of a blind spot in detecting traffic in metal aircraft
right behind the tail. They have done some tests in the most popular
airplanes and the schematic below gives a good indication of the area
that is shielded in our P210. |
|
 |
|
The
monochrome display is very readable in most situations, also at night
even though it’s not dimmable. I would have preferred a colour screen in
a higher resolution, something like an OLED display, which is a very
common and affordable technology today. Colour can also indicate
different types of warnings and urgencies.
Perhaps a
colour screen for a 3-1/8" round mount for the dashboard mounted unit?
The traffic
screen contains the target information of the three nearest threats,
with the most acute threat displayed in bigger numbers. You will know
instantly how far the other aircraft are, whether they are above or
below you or cruising along at your altitude. In addition, you have a
trend indication to show whether they are climbing or descending
relative to you. The XRX also indicates which direction your head
should turn to detect the incoming traffic. No nervous swiveling to
spot the bogey which could upset your passengers. Instead, you can
impress them with your incredible eyesight: "Can you see that
aircraft on our right? He is about 5 miles out and heading straight for
us!” |
|
 |
|
Some years
ago I was doing a charter flight taking a bunch of tourists from Italy
on an Outback tour of Australia. Two weeks in the saddle, covering some
of the harshest and most stunning geography this continent has to
offer. Yes, we also did the obligatory aerial tour of Ayers Rock. With
dozens of aircraft circling this massive monolith and the nearby Olgas
Range it can be a crowded place. From the radio chatter I knew that the
Boeing 737 which I had seen at Alice Springs before, and which carried
some US senators, was ahead of me in the circuit. He would be circling
the Olgas and head straight for me just 500 feet below… you can be sure
that my plane was lit up like a Christmas tree as I literally sat on the
edge of my seat trying to spot that aircraft and avoid a diplomatic
incident! That, my friends, is an XRX moment. I would have paid double
the purchase price to have the peace of mind of knowing exactly where
that sightseeing 737 was! Apart from those moments of apprehension it
was kinda cool to fly above an aluminium “undercast”… |
.JPG) |
.JPG) |
|
We have
flown many hours with the PCAS units from SureCheck/Zaon and have become
quite familiar with their potentially life-saving assistance in bringing
nearby traffic to your attention. All these units work as advertised,
detecting all the transponder equipped aircraft around you, provided of
course that those transponders have been switched on and are being
interrogated by ground radar or active TCAS units. Most pilots will
have a hard time believing there are that many other aircraft
sharing your airspace, which is all the more reason to invest in a
system with better eyesight than any other safety pilot on board.
With all
these improvements over the previous model I am quite happy with the
capability, performance, and reliability of the XRX. Sure, there will
always be room for improvement, particularly in the area of display
technology but that might have to wait till the XRXi model comes out… |
|
|
|
Where the
XRX really shines is in detecting traffic that you would otherwise not
know about: aircraft in your blind spots for instance. But even in
optimal circumstances when visibility is unlimited, aircraft present
such a small target that they are hard to spot if they are more than
just a couple of miles away. With combined approach speeds of several
hundred miles per hour we only have very few precious seconds to
determine if we need to take evasive action. Page 44 in the XRX manual
has a table of recognition and reaction times. From the moment we see
an object and recognise it as an aircraft, to the time we conclude that
we are indeed on a collision course, takes about six seconds. Then we
need to decide to turn left or right, descend or climb, translate that
into muscle movement and deal with the aircraft lag time. Add another 6
1/2 seconds. If your combined approach speeds would be 600 mph and you
first spotted that converging aircraft two miles away you would be half
a second into a midair collision…
We can see
that early detection is absolutely critical. The XRX does not do away
with the need to “see and avoid”. On the contrary, the XRX is a
tremendous tool for traffic detection. |
|
 |
|
The XRX has
a very simple menu structure which makes it easy to set up. One screen,
however, is intriguing: it's the one for third-party communications
setup.
It mentions
TrueFlight and AnywhereMap. Now I have been a user of the AnywhereMap
program ever since it came out a few years ago. It runs on a Pocket PC
and is a brilliant moving map program. The US version has gone through
quite a few changes and improvements but the rest of the world has been
languishing for some years now, despite promises of catering to the
European and Australian flying fraternity with updated databases. I
have almost stopped using AnywhereMap in favour of other capable
programs that are more up-to-date but I would go back to ControlVision’s
AWM in a heartbeat if it were updated for the Aussie market.
Particularly now that it will be possible in the near future to output
data from the XRX onto the brilliant VGA screen of my iPAQ 4700. This
is what Richard Herbst of CV mentioned in an e-mail recently:
“We
will approach the PCAS in two stages: as a standalone application/device
which it currently is, and as an integrated system capable of showing
its data on the Anywhere Map display.”
Here’s
hoping…
An
interesting footnote is that CV is supplying the injection-moulded cases
for the XRX.
|
|
.JPG) |
|
|
|
And while
we’re looking to the future: the firmware in the XRX can be upgraded
although it seems that these upgrades can only be performed in the US
factory. Mine came with version 1 .3 installed so obviously we have
already been through a few changes, all of them relatively minor. If
Zaon expects many firmware upgrades over the lifetime of this model it
would have been handier and cheaper to be able to do these online as you
can readily do with the cheapest of MP3 players. |
|
.JPG) |
|
|
|
Obvious
improvements over the previous top-end model, the VRX, include the
directional guidance, the addition of a fan for the electronics and a
much smaller and lighter package. It’s amazing the difference in weight
and that is a very good thing when it comes to placing heavy objects on
your dashboard…
By leaving
the batteries out and going from an all metal enclosure to plastic you
already get quite a bit of weight reduction and ever decreasing
electronic components certainly help also. The one thing it did gain
was the directional antenna, but as I mentioned before, Zaon will also
come out with a dashboard model that will have a remote mounted antenna.
If you can
live without the antenna and the quadrant bearing guidance it provides,
you may want to have a look at the new MRX. We hope to do so in the
next review but let us tantalise you by saying that this thing is tiny…
how about smaller than a deck of cards? Sure, it will only display the
top threat, whereas the XRX can display the three nearest threats even
though both units keep track of all the aircraft within your airspace
bubble (that’s 5 or 6 miles around you).
The MRX is
listed at USD499 and the XRX can be your new eyes in the skies for
$1795. |
|
.JPG)
|
|
It might be
confusing if you are familiar with the models that SureCheck brought out
in recent years to see that suddenly the XRX is coming out under the
banner of Zaon. There is a good reason for it and here it is:
In the
words of Jason Clemens:
“In 2005, we split the SureCheck company into two
parts: Zaon Flight Systems, the new company, handles all avionics, while
SureCheck remains to handle our line of checklists and other
publications. In fact, SureCheck continues to be the largest producer of
aviation checklists in the world, selling over 50,000 checklists
annually. Zaon (a combination of the two founder's names), can wholly
focus on the complex task of continuing the best-selling line of
collision avoidance avionics.”
And
best-selling they are: it the few months since releasing the new models
Zaon has sold more than a thousand units already. This is good going in
such a niche market. |
|
 |
|
|
|
Review by:
Martin Regtien |
|
|
|